What the Owners Say
“Unable to heat our building satis
factorily with cast iron boilers”
“Experienced considerable trouble
with cracked sections, which tied
us up when we least desired it”
“Experience of the last two years has more than warranted our decision to purchase a Pacific Boiler”
“With lower coal consumption, we were able to heat our building with
out pushing the boiler to anywhere
near its capacity”
Plant: The Bamberger-Rein
thal Co., Cleveland, Ohio.
HeatingLoad: 14,786 sq.ft., total equivalent cast iron radiation.
Original Installation (replaced after three years): Two cast
iron boilers, rated at 8,000
sq. ft. each.
Present Heating Plant (now beginning third year): One
No. 625 Pacific Boiler, rated at 15,500 sq. ft.
Here Heating Was
a Failure—Until They
Installed a Pacific
After three years of difficulty with another type of boiler, this Pacific installation solved a troublesome heat
ing problem. Smooth, dependable operation instead of annoying shutdowns—adequate capacity to heat the jbuilding, doing away with former difficulties in maintaining the proper temperature—these were two Pacific advantages which made the owners enthusiastic.
But the Pacific did more. It accomplished these results with 28 % less fuel. Coal consumption for the season of 1923-4, with another type of boiler, was 290 tons. During the season of 1924-5, the Pacific burned 210 tons.
The owners have given complete details of their experience with Pacific Steel Heating Boilers in the
letter quoted here. It tells an interesting story, typical of Pacific results in heating buildings everywhere.
Write for catalogs and complete information. GENERAL BOILERS COMPANY, Waukegan, Illinois
BRANCH OFFICES IN PRINCIPAL CITIES
PACIFIC
STEEL. HEATING BOILERS
Specifications of most products advertised in THE AMERICAN ARCHITECT appear in the Specification Manual
“Unable to heat our building satis
factorily with cast iron boilers”
“Experienced considerable trouble
with cracked sections, which tied
us up when we least desired it”
“Experience of the last two years has more than warranted our decision to purchase a Pacific Boiler”
“With lower coal consumption, we were able to heat our building with
out pushing the boiler to anywhere
near its capacity”
Plant: The Bamberger-Rein
thal Co., Cleveland, Ohio.
HeatingLoad: 14,786 sq.ft., total equivalent cast iron radiation.
Original Installation (replaced after three years): Two cast
iron boilers, rated at 8,000
sq. ft. each.
Present Heating Plant (now beginning third year): One
No. 625 Pacific Boiler, rated at 15,500 sq. ft.
Here Heating Was
a Failure—Until They
Installed a Pacific
After three years of difficulty with another type of boiler, this Pacific installation solved a troublesome heat
ing problem. Smooth, dependable operation instead of annoying shutdowns—adequate capacity to heat the jbuilding, doing away with former difficulties in maintaining the proper temperature—these were two Pacific advantages which made the owners enthusiastic.
But the Pacific did more. It accomplished these results with 28 % less fuel. Coal consumption for the season of 1923-4, with another type of boiler, was 290 tons. During the season of 1924-5, the Pacific burned 210 tons.
The owners have given complete details of their experience with Pacific Steel Heating Boilers in the
letter quoted here. It tells an interesting story, typical of Pacific results in heating buildings everywhere.
Write for catalogs and complete information. GENERAL BOILERS COMPANY, Waukegan, Illinois
BRANCH OFFICES IN PRINCIPAL CITIES
PACIFIC
STEEL. HEATING BOILERS
Specifications of most products advertised in THE AMERICAN ARCHITECT appear in the Specification Manual